SchoolTube Community
SchoolTube Presents: The Urban Planning Battle: Jane Jacobs vs. Robert Moses
In the heart of New York City, a fierce battle of urban philosophies unfolded between two influential figures: Jane Jacobs and Robert Moses. Their clash over the Lower Manhattan Expressway would shape the very fabric of U.S. city planning, leaving a lasting impact on the urban landscapes we see today.
The Contending Visionaries
Jane Jacobs: A passionate advocate for community-centered urban planning, Jacobs believed in preserving the vibrant social fabric of neighborhoods. She championed the idea that cities should be designed for the people who live in them, prioritizing human needs and interactions over grand infrastructure projects.
Robert Moses: A powerful city planner and public official, Moses was known for his ambitious infrastructure projects that transformed New York City. He favored large-scale developments, often disregarding the impact on existing communities and prioritizing efficiency over social considerations.
The Lower Manhattan Expressway Controversy
The battleground for these contrasting philosophies was the Lower Manhattan Expressway, a proposed highway that would have cut through the heart of several vibrant neighborhoods. Jacobs vehemently opposed the project, arguing that it would destroy the social fabric of these communities and displace thousands of residents.
Moses, on the other hand, saw the expressway as a necessary improvement for traffic flow and economic development. He believed that the benefits of the highway outweighed the negative impacts on local communities.
The Fight for Urban Planning’s Soul
The battle between Jacobs and Moses transcended the Lower Manhattan Expressway project. It represented a fundamental clash of ideologies about the purpose and design of cities. Jacobs’s focus on community well-being and Moses’s emphasis on efficiency and progress became defining fault lines in urban planning.
Ultimately, Jacobs’s grassroots efforts, supported by local residents and activists, managed to halt the construction of the Lower Manhattan Expressway. Her victory marked a turning point in urban planning, shifting the focus towards more community-oriented and sustainable approaches.
Lessons from the Jacobs-Moses Debate
The Jacobs-Moses debate continues to resonate in urban planning discussions today. It highlights the importance of considering the social and human dimensions of urban development, ensuring that infrastructure projects serve the needs of the communities they impact.
As we navigate the challenges of modern city planning, we can draw valuable lessons from this historic battle. By striking a balance between progress and preservation, and prioritizing the well-being of our communities, we can create cities that are both functional and livable for all.
Additional Resources:
- Dory, J. (2018). Clash of urban philosophies: Moses versus Jacobs. Journal of Planning History, 17(1), 20-41.
- Scheper, G. L. (2008). A divergence of modernities: Jane Jacobs, Robert Moses, and the re-visioning of New York City. Community college humanities review, 28, 92-106.
- Flint, A. (2009). Wrestling with Moses: How Jane Jacobs took on New York’s master builder and transformed the American city. Random House.
Produced by Dave Amos and the fine folks at Nebula Studios.
Written by Dave Amos
Select images and video from Getty Images.
Black Lives Matter.
Trans rights.